Toys for non bettors!!!

Started by FrankD., December 10, 2013, 02:25:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

FrankD.

Comments  
 8
   Email  
 
PrintEmail
TUCSON, Ariz. The New York Racing Association's new marketing strategy of focusing on the "guest experience" at its three tracks is working and the association's board remains on target to restructure and "reprivatize" the non-profit by late 2015, NYRA's new chief executive, Chris Kay, said during a speech opening the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing and Gaming on Tuesday morning in Tucson, Ariz.

Kay said that measurements of handle, attendance, and per capita spending at the Belmont fall meet and ongoing Aqueduct winter meet showed positive results for NYRA's new marketing strategy, which he said borrows from his former experience at Toys 'R' Us and Universal Parks and Resorts. While attendance and handle were down slightly at the marquee Saratoga meet, Kay said that per-capita spending on food and beverage and merchandise at the meet was up 15 percent, calling that a better measure of the track's performance.

"Attendance doesn't spend money," Kay said. "People do."

The Tuesday speech by Kay was his first public presentation to the racing industry as chief executive of NYRA since being hired by the association's board in the summer, when not counting presentations he has made that have been live-streamed over the Internet as part of NYRA's new policy to televise its board meetings. Kay was tabbed by a board that was restructured following the state takeover of the non-profit late last year at the behest of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Kay did not drift far afield on Tuesday from his presentations to the NYRA board, except in two instances: the first mention that NYRA is attempting to position itself for the possibility of the legalization of exchange wagering, and his first expansion on what the "reprivatization" of NYRA two years from now might entail.

Kay briefly stated that NYRA was preparing for exchange wagering as part of a series of comments on the company Global Betting Exchange, which NYRA recently hired to run its account-wagering platform. While Global Betting Exchange is known for setting up betting exchanges for overseas clients, NYRA officials had previously stated that the company was being hired for its expertise in online betting systems and had declined to comment on whether the company would develop an exchange-wagering platform for NYRA.

Exchange wagering, which was pioneered by the British company Betfair – also the owner of Television Games Network in the U.S. – is legal in some foreign jurisdictions, and two states, New Jersey and California, have passed laws allowing for the practice. Those laws require agreements with horsemen and tracks before the platforms can be launched, and so far racing constituents in the two states have not yet signed on, citing integrity concerns and a business model that, while beneficial to bettors, returns far less to horsemen and tracks than the current pari-mutuel system.

Exchange wagering allows bettors to post prices on horses and accept bets at those prices. Under the system, one side is betting on a horse to lose. Survey after survey has indicated that U.S. racing's largest problem is the perception of its integrity, and critics of the system have said that the implementation of exchange wagering could further complicate racing's ability to market its product because of the perception, right or wrong, that bettors could conspire with racing participants to hold horses, a far easier task than getting a horse to win.

Of course, Kay may have mentioned the possibility of exchange wagering as part of a strategy to begin to drum up interest in the "reprivatization" of NYRA. NYRA and state officials have not made clear what the state is planning for NYRA at the end of the three-year term of the restructured board, but it's widely believed that the association will be put out to bid. The possibility of exchange wagering on NYRA's product could entice betting-exchange companies into the mix.

Kay and other board members have recently said they will focus on making NYRA profitable, at least on paper, without the benefit of counting the tens of millions of dollars of revenue derived from statutorily required payments from a casino located on the property of Aqueduct Racetrack. But any plan to make NYRA profitable – and attractive to a private company – would almost certainly entail the overhaul of New York's racing statutes, which contain carve-outs of NYRA's revenue to a host of constituents and put hurdles in front of any plan by NYRA to open OTBs in New York City's five boroughs.

Kay said during his speech that NYRA is reviewing the state's laws for any changes it deems necessary to return the association to a cash-positive position, as well as reviewing the requirements for its real estate holdings (the state owns the deeds to the land as part of an earlier bankruptcy restructuring). He also said that a consulting group hired by NYRA is evaluating "various scenarios for each property" and "weighing the return on investment" for those scenarios. One of those scenarios could include the closing of Aqueduct.

But beyond that, Kay did not offer any further details on reprivatization, other than to promise a lot will be "new" after three years of state oversight.

"We have an opportunity to create a new structure, a new business plan, a new set of revised regulations

richiebee

From DRF:

\"Perhaps that's why Kay – and so many others before him – have said that racing must do much more to attract both young people and women, since they are so underrepresented among the sport's most earnest players. Specifically, Kay said that NYRA was going to attempt to market to women who control a family's budget, using data that show that most families' retail and vacation decisions are controlled by women, something he learned during his time at Toys 'R' Us and Universal Parks and Resorts.\"

This just shows that the $75,000 NYRA spent for a mentor for Kay did not go to waste; Kay\'s statement shows that he is every bit as BRILLIANT!! as 90% of the alleged leaders of the industry. IF YOU HIRE SOMEONE AT A SALARY APPROACHING $300,000, AND THEN SPEND AN ADDITIONAL $75,000 TO MENTOR HIM, ARE WE NOT SAYING THAT WE DID NOT GET THE MOST QUALIFED PERSON FOR THE JOB?

OK, I\'ll stop yelling now..

So let\'s see we are at a critical point where a lot of decisions which will determine the viability of Racing need to be made, and the Boob from Toyland stands up in front of the industry and states that resources should be expended  trying to attract a demographic which has somehow avoided the allure and romance of Racing for decades.

But the Boob from Toyland might be crazy like a fox. If he raises admission enough, while continuing to allow Belmont and Aqueduct to crumble under the weight of years of neglect, attendance will dwindle to the point where the overhead involved with hosting a live crowd can almost entirely be eliminated.

miff

Kay already morphed into a Clueless Clown, a rather seamless transition. The guy is obviously overwhelmed and over his head.His persistent inane theme of \"enhancing the guest experience\" confirms he does remotely comprehend that a meaningful gain in regular attendance at NYRA tracks is virtually impossible.

New NYRA Director Of Racing, Martin Stanza,may counter balance Kay.NY racing in the firm grip of Albany with a neophyte politically hired stooge at the helm.....very sad for those of us that love the game.


Mike
miff