Anyone Keeping Score?

Started by richiebee, April 12, 2006, 06:38:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chuckles_the_Clown2

richiebee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Big:
>
>     Gomez\'s choice or Baffert\'s?

Where to start?

Jockey choices...I did read that Gomez\'s agent said that Garrett would be riding Bob and John in the Derby. Which leads me to where I really want to start...Bob and John.

Bob and John is a May foal and he most certainly has been a little green. He is however blossoming. He\'s a spring Tulip reaching for the sun and come the First Saturday in May, he may be in full bloom.

Which brings us back to Garrett Gomez. Maybe by the First Saturday in May Bob and John will develop even further and eclipse where Sinister Minister was last Saturday. Regardless of that I can\'t find any reason to discount what Sinister Minister did on the track that day.

Now to Bob Baffert. Bob said that Sinister Minister was going to Kentucky quote \"As soon as he gets up...he laid it all on the line in the Blue Grass\". Unquote. (Note that is a fairly accurate paraphrase.) What do you all think about that? Was Baffert just shooting from the hip regarding the reality of what occurred on Saturday? Or does anyone think that just perhaps there may have been a little more to what he said?

The fastest horse will certainly win the Derby, but to cash do you believe you sometimes have to think your way back to the window?



shanahan

CTC - no idea what you are leading to...can you explain?

Secondly, the radio show tonight  from MIA had several guests all saying tha tLawyer ron was slow....slow?  they were going on Beyers, which don\'t necessarily match what TG has him....proof of a better product w/ TG?

big18741



 Funny that Point Determined who doesn\'t interest Gomez could go off shortest of the 3 Baffert horses.






richiebee

Shanahan:

    Would never want to speak on behalf of A.P. Chuckles, but he seemed to be saying that Baffert candidly admitted that the BG took its toll on SM.

    The DRF chart of the BG is fascinating to me... it says that SM finished \"under brisk left handed pressure\", yet the final 3/8s was run in 38.91 seconds.

    Also heard part of the radio broadcast; besides saying that LR was \"slow\", none of the commentators were very high on John McKee.

    Also interesting that they mentioned that the final part of the Oaklawn stretch is uphill; Bailey mentioned this on the Saturday telecast; had never heard this before. I thought only the animals that I bet on were running uphill.

RICH

FWIW, and I am not much of a \"time man\" 10 out of the last 11 derby winners closed in under 13, and 9 -11 under 38. Pretty interesting no?

Lance


tmon

You do remember that the last time SM had run he had bounced off of the rail at Golden Gate. The Jock may have been told to keep him off the rail.

richiebee

Lance:

     Appreciate the link, and it presents good evidence that the final furlong at OP is downhill. I was fairly certain I had heard Bailey mention that the stretch sloped uphill, but as old age advances I guess I hear only what I want to hear.

     I wonder if management at OP has ever considered \"leveling the playing field\" so to speak?

     

alydar104

I thought JD said the Keeneland stretch was downhill.

Dana666

I\'m enjoying this thread. Thanks guys!

Regarding Sinster Minester, as visually impressive as the Blue Grass was, I felt that was an exceptionally weak field and going wire to wire at Keeneland as well as a long history I personally have of betting horses who looked super in the Blue Grass and fizzled on Derby Day would lead me to make him (almost) an automatic throw-out, especailly with the amount of other quality speed horses; huge beyers or figs in lone speed races mean very little to me. I am much more in a quandry trying to evaluate Brother Derek\'s SA Derby, that race still has me puzzled.

Regarding Baffert & P-Val he sometimes uses P-Val, but not usually on anything decent; it would seem a no brainer if you have a horse like Minister, why wouldn\'t you want P-val on him? But a lot of trainers out west have a bias against him for his past history -- stupid in my opinion. Victor Espinoza is a horror show on a horse -- he\'s incredible, really -- loves to go as wide as possible for as long as possible on every horse he rides in every race he rides. I wouldn\'t ride him in a mule race -- well, maybe a mule race because they don\'t have turns -- he\'d be fine there. I remember War Emblem, so don\'t get on me there -- another example of a lone speed type -- if no one went with him, he was super -- in any kind of a fight, he disappered. The derby is usually a fight.

Chuckles_the_Clown2

Lance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, the Oaklawn stretch is DOWNHILL for 9F
> races:
>
> The formatting is a little weird, but the content
> still reads...
>
> [72.14.203.104]

Randy Moss the surveyor. The doubter of Althea and Cherokee\'s closing fractions. I wonder if he doubted Smarty and Alex too?

Thats a very old story that was thoroughly debunked.

Quit confusing the folks. Its hard enough to pick the Derby for people. Poor Dana666 and RICH have A.P.Warrior as a horse with potential, now you\'ve filled their heads with whitewater rafting.



Lance

\"Thats a very old story that was thoroughly debunked.\"

Was it really really debunked? I\'ve heard nothing of the sort. If so, my bad.

Chuckles_the_Clown2

tmon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You do remember that the last time SM had run he
> had bounced off of the rail at Golden Gate. The
> Jock may have been told to keep him off the rail.

That is correct. In his first two turn attempt vs. Cause to Believe he bounded off the rail twice. Cause may have run him down anyway, but he deserved a chance that he might have needed to see two turns twice. Now he has.