Nyquist - please win the Preakness

Started by Tale Of Ekati, May 07, 2016, 04:24:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

johnnym

Think you guys are really underestimating this horse..
I was sold On this horse after his Breeders Cup he had no business winning that race.
Early word looks like a lot of pace shipping in for the Preakness..

Leamas57

Ship in a track variant of 10 or 12 or higher and we will have a race IMO.

Leamas

bellsbendboy

\"Nothing on this site about accomplishment\".

Fair enough JB, yet if accomplishment equals class, there is often going to be, in any give race, an 800 pound gorilla that looms the \"horse\" to beat for performance figure players.

Not at all a knock, nor a revelation, perhaps an assertion.





bbb

TGJB

Two assertions, one in the premise.
TGJB

dskidmore1

My question about this horse is whether it is a horse that has immense talent but will only unleash that talent if needed or is he a horse that just hit his peak and is ready for a reality check.

Chas04

I just knew this was coming. LOL Gotta love it. Just like everyone last year was wrong for playing AP on top every race as well. GL to ya Joe though...I certainly won\'t be.

sekrah

Chas04 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just knew this was coming. LOL Gotta love it.
> Just like everyone last year was wrong for playing
> AP on top every race as well. GL to ya Joe
> though...I certainly won\'t be.


And they were right the previous 37 times. You can keep backing the Derby winner every year for the rest of your life. I won\'t try to stop you, I promise.

Chas04

touche. they all go down its just being right when they do. this one looks to me tough as nails tho.

horsegoer


Chas04


JimP

And you can say this without even knowing who he will be running against?

johnnym

What do you see that you say that?

jbelfior

Can\'t say that on here. You\'re upsetting too many people who can\'t wait to wheel the Derby winner next Saturday.

Good Luck,
Joe B

sekrah

It doesn\'t really matter who he\'d be running against. An X is an X.


JimP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And you can say this without even knowing who he
> will be running against?

TGJB

A few years ago I was at a Jockey Club party a few days before the Belmont, and in telling Alex Waldrop why they needed to spread out the Triple Crown, I said whatever happens Saturday, I\'ll Have Another won\'t be around long. He was retired the next morning.

There\'s probably an X and a layoff coming with Nyquist. The X might not come this time, but it\'s coming.

This horse ain\'t AP, and it ain\'t trained by Baffert. Go through the Archives and find the ones who ran big in all three... that were not trained by Baffert.
TGJB