Garbage out

[Roman]

For forty dollars a race card, for that info and format , let alone not taking into consideration of the accuracy of the very limited data that that product provides, is tough to justify.

To each their own. But that\'s freaking crazy.

Any student of figures and figure making know who\'s figures are the most accurate.  I don\'t know of any other data company that is so transparent with their process, and access to it to actually back test that data.

[TGJB]

Gary, after scratches,at 30-1, I can’t argue with using that horse in the Woody.

[Gary Irish]

Thanks Jerry. I thought I saw him charge the gate just before the break. He wasn\'t sharp, that is for sure.

I am very clean now. Why? I am taking a bath (lol).

I will say this. No way to play Randomized using Rags. The main track seems front, and Geroux rode over confident, but no way I play her. Hmm. It seems you had her pegged, so props.

My two remaining plays are: Race 10, $20 win 4 Blazing Sevens.

Race 11 late p4 (minimum): All  /  9  /  1 3 4 11  / 2. An $18 play.

When I lose like this I rarely rally........

[Roman]

I lurked to that board and saw this,

\" have been using these numbers for a very long time because it is my belief that it gives me the best chance of beating a very difficult game.Other people may differ especially the guy across the street with his \'\'changing track speeds and water on the track and any other nonsense to prove his point\"\'People go to a restauarant because they like the food and they leave  when they don\'t/This restaurant  is still packing them in.Go find a new hobby .\"

The changing track speed and the amount of water they put on the track, or lack of water, directly relates to the speed of the track.

Do figure makers really discard changing track conditions?

So are they implying that if the track starts out fast, and after the third race , 3 inches of rain fell, that the speed of the track remains the same?