Agree with all your points. Let\'s face it -- BB failed miserably. Why? There\'s no reason and there\'s a hundred reasons. This is horse racing.
KD is an easy target and Dutrow chose to fire at him, at least initially. Dutrow is many things, including a man who takes pride in his work. When KD says \"I had no horse\" to millions of viewers, what trainer wouldn\'t take that personally in that situation.
I didn\'t have the winner, but sensing a soft pace I used him underneath. The results weren\'t that shocking, were they? Only 2 horses with any semblance of speed and one of them doesn\'t run his race. The other is more than ready to run, sets soft fractions, and speed-pops the field. Sure, it was the Belmont and a TC was on the line, but it was just another horse race also. What kind of odds would we have seen with BB out of the race? The lone speed play would have been a popular angle I would think.
The much more interesting discussion is what we do with BB the next time he runs, an apparent likely possibility.
KD is an easy target and Dutrow chose to fire at him, at least initially. Dutrow is many things, including a man who takes pride in his work. When KD says \"I had no horse\" to millions of viewers, what trainer wouldn\'t take that personally in that situation.
I didn\'t have the winner, but sensing a soft pace I used him underneath. The results weren\'t that shocking, were they? Only 2 horses with any semblance of speed and one of them doesn\'t run his race. The other is more than ready to run, sets soft fractions, and speed-pops the field. Sure, it was the Belmont and a TC was on the line, but it was just another horse race also. What kind of odds would we have seen with BB out of the race? The lone speed play would have been a popular angle I would think.
The much more interesting discussion is what we do with BB the next time he runs, an apparent likely possibility.
