neither can the cubs

Beware all cub fans. They are in dire need off something for nothing.

Don\'t apologize. Brown apparently sees some merit to the
rants or he perhaps delights in subjecting others to CTC\'s
garbage rather than deleting his pathetic drivel.

bear in mind that half-wits and better can only benefit
from contributors of ctc\'s ilk

does this mean i should put my Guiness back in the fridge?

wow. no humorless clown or classless class. i\'m nearly miffed.
brilliant, brilliant. pop a guiness

my version of common sense is still telling me that there was scamming at any point in the process where delays occur-- wether 4 races or 4 seconds.
the total lack of concern and/or contrition over faulty timing at gp, haw, etc in recent memory is sign enough that rudy\'s chore will be confined to having all buy in on dirty deeds only occurring at auto & otb

your rudy question couldn\'t be more to the point. and i\'ll be shocked if this whole thing doesn\'t lead to the finding of much more than what the bc3 pulled off. and i wonder how many 10%ers will be elevated to
110%ers.

a big whale sucking up my [our] money as he lazily swims around a tipless iceberg in the north dakota ocean.

i believe only failure to forego the fix when long prices won 2 of 4 cost them.
they should have realized that a long horse in leg 5 or 6 would in all likely hood bring unwanted attention.
i would also like to hear why in the world north dakota warrants a hub and has their own tote co. wonder if i could be a whale with my own hub?
and wouldn\'t public disclosure of winning ticket configuration have made scan bets more difficult or at least a lot more expensive?
i know nothing about data transmission and computers but the very idea of scan wagers boggles the mind.
is there a need to be concerned about doubles,pers,tris,etc?

only a blind man on a gallopping horse would have failed to cash on lb and gm if he visited this bb

amen  amen