McPeek Got F&#KED Yesterday. Inside Job.

[Silver Charm]

6 straight wins in a Money Line parlay is significant. It wasnt 6 straight against the Raiders. You said it yourself.

Always may have been an exaggeration. If its 60% of the time that\'s enough for a professional group like the one Billy Walters described in his Book. They played Coin Toss Selection tendencies. As in do they take the ball or defer. Amd who scores first. He claimed they had $50K maybe $100K on that Parlay in the Super Bowl with Arizona and Pittsburgh

And NFL Official could call holding on every play. A Breeders Cup Vet is he watching every horse warm up stride for stride. No he can\'t. And if he is just watching certain Trainers and Connections that is a serious problem. Kenny runs them sound and Mystik Dan if that is the last race of his career should not be remembered as \"lame and unsound\" because a Hometown Vet said he was. Horse Racing is becoming unbettable.

[P-Dub]

Silver Charm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 6 straight wins in a Money Line parlay is
> significant. It wasnt 6 straight against the
> Raiders. You said it yourself.
>
> Always may have been an exaggeration. If its 60%
> of the time that\'s enough for a professional group
> like the one Billy Walters described in his Book.
> They played Coin Toss Selection tendencies. As in
> do they take the ball or defer. Amd who scores
> first. He claimed they had $50K maybe $100K on
> that Parlay in the Super Bowl with Arizona and
> Pittsburgh
>
> And NFL Official could call holding on every play.
> A Breeders Cup Vet is he watching every horse warm
> up stride for stride. No he can\'t. And if he is
> just watching certain Trainers and Connections
> that is a serious problem. Kenny runs them sound
> and Mystik Dan if that is the last race of his
> career should not be remembered as \"lame and
> unsound\" because a Hometown Vet said he was. Horse
> Racing is becoming unbettable.

You aren\'t playing a 6 game ML parlay because you haven\'t yet identified the streak. At what point do you say.....hey this team wins with this ref??

Unless you have an incredible ability to target a streak before it even happens.

Its an insignificant sample size, and you didn\'t target the streak from game 1 because you had no clue the next 5 games would also be wins....so not one person would have put together a 6 game ML parlay. Zero.

And my point using the Raiders is that if its so significant, why did they barely win as a 13 point fav?

Yes, there are very few officials that hover around 60%. And again, you have to identify them in time for it to matter...and guess what.....the following year they aren\'t close to 60%.

Your premise isn\'t bad, but putting it into practice isn\'t nearly as easy as you\'re making it out to be.