Belmont 9

Started by P-Dub, June 03, 2017, 02:49:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

P-Dub

The D\'Amato horse at 9/1 looks like a pretty square price. A little slow but not by much and draws a good post.
P-Dub

hellersorr

The winner is Oscar Performance.  This is a horse of whom I wanted to post a TG question before the race but I would have been asking for info that I hadn\'t paid for.  

Here\'s the question, and maybe there isn\'t an obvious answer for the TG crowd but what the hell:  On the sheets, does this horse look like a typical rounding-into-form 3rd-off-the-layoff play, or does he look like a horse who doesn\'t look likely today to return to his juvenile glory?

I realize odds are important but I\'m putting odds to the side for this question.

TGJB

Dead rail last time.
TGJB

hellersorr

Doh!  Forgot all about the dead turf rail Derby Day.  (Although that brings up the question of muscle soreness from racing on deep turf.)

But let\'s say there was no dead turf rail that day:  What would the horse\'s sheets line look like?

milwmike

You can see the sheet in ROTW section - Derby day info is available.

To my eye, I would not have predicted a return to his 2 yo figs.  And with the slow pace and saving ground, my guess is he still didn\'t get to last year.

jimbo66

Hellersorr,

Do you have a sheet in front of you when you ask this question?

If you do, it is a horrendous question.  The horse finished last year, pairing 5\'s.  He has come back this year and ran an 8, a bad figure, and then backed up to a 14 last time.

If you discount the \"dead rail\", the horse is deceased and can\'t be bet in any way in any slot.  

Now, he did have excuses in both races, not just the dead rail, so today was the decision day \"deceased or valid excuses\".  Turns out it was the latter.

But 8 and then 14, with tops of 5, is not \"rounding into form\", it is \"falling off a cliff\".

TGJB

TGJB

P-Dub

jimbo66 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hellersorr,
>
> Do you have a sheet in front of you when you ask
> this question?
>

He said \"on the sheets\".

So its 1-1 in regards to stupid questions.
P-Dub

TreadHead

Bal-aBali also won a stakes today off the negative CD rail race

hellersorr

I use \"sheets\" referring to TG graphs, as opposed to The Sheets (Ragozin).  If there\'s a more appropriate term, let me know - I\'ll be happy to use it.

hellersorr

No, Jimbo, I do NOT have the sheet in front of me.  But even if I DID have the sheet in front of me, I would have asked the exact same question.  I was intrigued by Oscar Performance and was curious about the orthodox TG read (if there was one).

I ask a LOT of questions.  If a person got paid for asking questions, I\'d be a gazillionaire.  Tragically, this is not the case.

Here\'s another question:  Why do you so consistently . . . ah, never mind.  Life\'s too short.

Tavasco

Gud Poynt

I was wondering who in the world would bet this horse? 7/2? Someone knew something I didn\'t. Again.

P-Dub

hellersorr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I use \"sheets\" referring to TG graphs, as opposed
> to The Sheets (Ragozin).  If there\'s a more
> appropriate term, let me know - I\'ll be happy to
> use it.


Sheets is fine, I wasn\'t referring to your use of the word sheets.
P-Dub

P-Dub

Tavasco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gud Poynt
>
> I was wondering who in the world would bet this
> horse? 7/2? Someone knew something I didn\'t.
> Again.

He was a logical contender. Not sure anyone \"knew\" anything, he had excuses for the 2 poor performances this year. An off slow and a dead rail. Excuse those 2 and he looked as good as any.
P-Dub

Tavasco

P-Dub

Smiling, Whaa... Excuses?? Two in a row. OK as many views as there are pairs of eyes.

I excused his Kee race when I bet him @ CD. No more excuses from me. That\'s like saying the Cavaliers don\'t practice enough @ at sea level.

In any event he looks to have run a new top imo.  Now what?