Breeders Cup 2yo races purse increase

Started by MO, August 28, 2003, 02:11:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MO

What a coincidence! I was just thinking about a way to help the breed refocus its emphasis on stamina and durability. My idea was to lower the purses for the Juv and Juv Fillies to $500,000 and put the saved $1,000,000 towards the Turf and Filly Mare Turf races. The idea being that if the purses for 2yo\'s were not so big, that owners and trainers of 2 yo\'s would be more patient with their horses and await the bigger prizes as 3 yos and up.
But alas, someone came up with a \"better\" idea and raised the purses to $1.5 million.

Phalaris

I have repeatedly brought the point up that in decades past, when it was routine for top-class 2YOS to grow up to be classic horses at 3 and still be around at 4, the richest races in the country were for 2YOs.
Although the trend toward big money for 2YO races began in the late 1800s, it\'s very apparent by the 1950s; consider that Tom Fool, best remembered now for winning the Handicap Triple Crown and going undefeated in 10 starts at 4 in 1953 (including the Met Mile, Suburban, Brooklyn, Whitney, Pim Special, Carter and assorted other races) en route to HOY honors over Native Dancer that year, was a champion at 2 and never again took home a purse more than half of what he won in the Futurity. By the mid-1960s, six or seven of the most valuable races of the year were for 2YOs. This persisted into the 1970s - the richest payday of Secretariat\'s life came not in the Derby, Preakness, Belmont or Marlboro Cup, but as a 2YO in the final running of the Garden State Stakes.

Actually, purses for top-level 2YO stakes races in the US have not been as low(compared to similarly prestigious stakes for older horses) as they are now in an enormously long time - most probably since the 1800s.

The problem lies elsewhere.


MO

With all due respect, to me that\'s like hiring a cook at $1,000 a week for the 1st year, then cutting his pay to $900 for the 2nd and $800 for the third. Seems to me a horse should earn money over time , and not just be \"given\"  money for a \"flash in the pan career\".
And I am not referring to the horses you mentioned, all greats. Thanks.