Aqueduct Analysis

Started by JR, December 08, 2008, 11:26:58 AM

Haynesfield? Fastest horse? Unless there\'s an error on my sheets, he\'s the 5th fastest horse. Explanation?
December 08, 2008, 11:26:58 AM
TGJB: Alan will be back in the office tomorrow.
December 08, 2008, 12:14:53 PM
drbillym: If you go in the redboard room, Haynesfield was the choice on Alan\'s analysis.
December 08, 2008, 04:00:40 PM
drbillym: sorry, you already knew that
December 08, 2008, 04:03:17 PM
TGAB: Three of the four faster horses had already bounced off the faster top and were headed in the wrong direction, so I thought. Faster horse number four was entered back here four weeks after a layoff-aided 12-1/2 point new top. Going long, a bounce seemed the most likely result. That left Hainesfield as the fastest (remaining) horse that was least likely to bounce and/or most likely to move forward. Granted my verbiage was confusing and did not express clearly the method to the seeming madness. With hope the above explanation removes the fog.
December 09, 2008, 01:50:42 PM
ronwar: Very interesting how you looked at the tops that way to reduce the fastest play.  You really should right a book with the angles and patterns you look at.  I would buy it and I\'m sure I would get more from it than the whole DRF collection combined. You take paypal :)
December 09, 2008, 03:56:46 PM
News: SMF - Just Installed!