Rachel Case, Round One

Started by TGJB, April 12, 2010, 03:10:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TGJB

The judge found that Lauffer owes us, but decided to base the amount on what is \"typical\" in the industry, rather than what I charge (which was testified to by four people), which means flat 5% of purchase price rather than our performance based fees.

Appeal to follow.
TGJB

mjellish

Well, at least he owes you.  Congrats on that part.

P-Dub

JB,

Sounds like quite a bit of money not coming your way...at least for now. Good luck with the appeal.

Why would he award what is \"typical\", when your proprietary information and knowledge is what allows you to make shrewd investments for your clients?? Not to mention, this guy sounds like a real piece of work.
P-Dub