ROTW

[cubfan0316]

yea, come on bob. lets see some pre polyquack race selections.talk smack, back it up.

[davidrex]

For once I agree w/ bob on his remarks about folks trashing a surface instead of preparing to compete with it.
FACE IT...its\' here to stay and if one can\'t get a line or angle on it;then those individuals will be forced to play tracks by chance.

[Chuckles_the_Clown2]

I won\'t bet Poly, (but for occasional big race day entertainment),  hoping that I\'m a member of a small but dedicated group that will ultimately be involved in Poly\'s defeat.

That said, the Hanshin Cup winner looked like a nice little flyer on TFigs and its hard to say he did not factor, especially winning on the wing which is generally against the bias on Polyfraud.

That said, I have to agree with Cubfan about someone purporting to be adept on the Rug without citing statistical support. Theres two Poly meets running today Bob. Thats over 20 races to pick 1 to prove your acumen. You can\'t rest upon the laurels of picking an undefeated deceased horse in the Preakness.

Maybe you\'d like to wait til a third Poly meet is running so you\'ll have 30 races to choose from to find one good race. Woodbine will be open next week.

bobphilo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ah the anti-poly squad is at it again. A horse
> wins at 80-1 despite having run a 0 on poly 2
> races back. I guess they feel so bad they missed
> it that they have to bad-mouth the surface again.
> Face it guys, your inability to handicap the
> surface properly is NOT an indictment on the
> surface. You might want to look to your
> handicapping instead of whining about the surface.
> I'm not the only one doing better than ever
> betting poly.
> It seems like some would prefer to lose so they
> can libel the surface and win their point while
> losing bets, rather than adjust to reality.
> Feel free to continue chasing your dirt biases on
> synthetics and increase my profits.
> Funny how the poly challenged, not content with
> bad mouthing the surface itself have taken to
> calling those, like themselves, that cannot deal
> with it, poly-quackers. Sounds like a perfect name
> for the poly-whiners. I'm sure Donald Duck
> squawking about his poly losses is the perfect
> image.
>
> Bob

[davidrex]

first opinion huh Bob?

[alm]

If you want an interesting way to spot winners on synthetic tracks, just pick a betting underlay you are convinced couldn\'t win the race if it was run on dirt.