bad beat kind of

[basket777]

well if gg won it could have been lights out   i had 8 of 9 in the place 9 as i singled gg  had the 7 and 5 with gg the 1 for $20  thank for the 5 in the race before that was enough to win for a few months. single her in pic 3\'s win exata\'s and triples.  mised the 10 but for 5 exata. to races befor the 5 was my bet.  what a pick 3 5 7 5 could have been.  but had the exta for 10  thanks  the early season is a wonderful thing.  both of the 5\'s  moved past there two year old number   to me that and a pair of a two year old is my major bets.  thanks thorograph. was a wonderful day that almost was in the 100 of thousands.

[Tabitha]

marcus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When initially looking at the race thrs eve for a
> contest , I liked GG but didn\'t think he\'d be any
> kind of a price . As it turned out my projected ML
> was wrong and GG was quite usable and a good play
> at the generous odd\'s - nice call ...

Greeley\'s Galaxy went off at 7-2. His projected morning line was 10-1. If you keyed him in 4th and wheeled the field to beat him by 4 points you scored. If you thought the fastest horses in the race were the ones that beat him you probably scored too.


basket777 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> well if gg won it could have been lights out   i
> had 8 of 9 in the place 9 as i singled gg  had the
> 7 and 5 with gg the 1 for $20  thank for the 5 in
> the race before that was enough to win for a few
> months. single her in pic 3\'s win exata\'s and
> triples.  mised the 10 but for 5 exata. to races
> befor the 5 was my bet.  what a pick 3 5 7 5 could
> have been.  but had the exta for 10  thanks  the
> early season is a wonderful thing.  both of the
> 5\'s  moved past there two year old number   to me
> that and a pair of a two year old is my major
> bets.  thanks thorograph. was a wonderful day that
> almost was in the 100 of thousands.

If Galaxy had run a legitimate Negative 2 in the Illinois Derby he\'d of had a much better chance. He was trying to win on a repeatable top of approximately 3. That was a very tall order.