Gulfstream vs. Gill

[asfufh]

Something to pass the time while waiting for the snow to melt:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=1st&navby=case&no=041944



Post Edited (03-15-05 11:01)

[HP]

I can\'t figure out why the police are not involved in any of this....  isn\'t \"removing a horse\'s leg without permission\" obstruction of justice?  There has to be some criminal liability here.  Any lawyers out there?  Where\'s my old contest opponent David Patent?

HP

[Chuckles_the_Clown2]

Wait a minute. Whose horse was it?

Secondly, is there some type of administrative rule that says if a horse is put down on the track the governmental agencies become possessors of the animal? If there is I\'m not aware of it.

The story says the leg was \"removed without permission\". What does that mean? Does it mean it was removed illegally or that the owners of the horse removed the leg without notifying others? If theres no post \"put down\" possessory interest by the \"authorities\" and none was discussed here, (so I\'m assuming there is none), the Judge or clerk that wrote this opinion should be whistled out of town. \"Without Permission\" ...give me a break, what does that mean? How was Gill supposed to know that Gulfstream and the TRB had earmarked any of his dead horses for autopsy?

The thing thats most appalling to me is that Gill is being charged with \"quasi bad things\" but no one is coming forward to say \"I saw this....I heard that\". They want to disciple Gill yet not have to get into the details of proving what the wrong is.  The TRB is not F.B.I. agent Donnie Brasco deep in the mob, needing to keep his cover.

Unbelieveable