Do we assume business as usual here? Meaning there will be little to none?
Read the TDN article in today\'s edition, and post it here if you want. I was behind them asking the questions there (and others), answer seems to be who cares.
That about all you need to read:
Unless it\'s indicated, we don\'t do any OOC testing
on any of the other [graded stakes entrants] unless we
have some reason to do it, Zipf said, like a tip that
Somebody might be playing games.
I remember Rudy shipping in Sage Valley a few years ago on race day off a pretty layoff (the previous fall). He ran like a 108 Beyer and totally rolled. He also never ran that good the rest of the year. Perhaps Rudy is that strong of a layoff trainer or perhaps Sage Valley really liked Pimlico. I am going to assume similar outcomes will occur again tomorrow......
Jamie Ness laughs at your testing.
Yep. Nice \"super\" trainer exacta in Pim 6 for $82. Ness and Rudy. \"Testing? We don\'t need no stinkin\' testing!\"
That\'s cause it\'s not my testing.
The cheaters are running wild right now. Gotta give Vyjack a big chance to get back to that top here no?
Molesap Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yep. Nice \"super\" trainer exacta in Pim 6 for $82.
> Ness and Rudy. \"Testing? We don\'t need no stinkin\'
> testing!\"
(2)
blood sample?...we don\'t got no blood sample...we don\'t have to give you no stinkin blood sample!...
We are the supertrainers....you know...Da unmounted police!
I thought I had read that all of the stakes horses are tested on Preakness day. Is that incorrect?