Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: TGJB on May 12, 2015, 10:41:20 AM

Title: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 12, 2015, 10:41:20 AM
We\'re pretty conscientious about reviewing figures if there\'s any doubt about accuracy, at any given time I have a list of about 50 races over the last few months that I go back and look at starting about a month after they ran. Recently that review made a very big difference-- I originally had Shook Up\'s maiden win much slower, after a few came back a couple of times (including her) I brought it to a 3, making her FG Oaks a return to her top, and setting her up for the play in the Oaks. Ragozin (whoever does FG) did it the way I originally did and didn\'t go back and review, so they had her off a 3 point new top into the Oaks.

Anyway, among the races I\'m watching is the Tampa Bay Derby, which could be a couple of points faster. It doesn\'t make much difference for the Preakness, and by the time we put sheets out for the Belmont I should have enough to make a final decision. It definitely will matter in handicapping that race.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: Agastache on May 12, 2015, 11:07:44 AM
Would that make Carpe Diem a 0-2-x?

Interesting price to round back into form off a 5 week break into the Belmont?
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: ruthlessman on May 12, 2015, 11:08:50 AM
Which means, if what your saying proves true, Carpe bounced in the Bluegrass and probably looks like an o 2 x. Danzig\'s line then would smooth out some.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 12, 2015, 11:27:35 AM
If AP wins the Preakness he\'s gonna have his hands full in the Belmont regardless, if that Tampa race is faster CD would be yet another danger. Let\'em all kill each other, Upstart\'s gonna win the second half of the year.

If FL beats AP in the Preakness, neither will show for the Belmont, and maxing at 90k will be the least of NYRA\'s worries.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: mjellish on May 12, 2015, 07:17:31 PM
Moon and Divining Rod were in the Tampa Derby, no?  

If it was faster, are we talking two points or so on your data?
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 12, 2015, 07:53:15 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: big18741 on May 13, 2015, 05:58:21 AM
Both of those horses came out of the TBD with possible excuses.

Danzig Moon didn\'t like the track(seems like the one you hear most when a horse doesn\'t fire)came back with cuts on his legs and got sick a few days after the race.

Divining Rod had foot issues,was training in a bar shoe and may have run with one that day.He also sat up on a pretty quick early pace for Tampa Bay that day before backing up.

Seems like one of these horses can work out a pretty good trip sucking around on the fence in 4th or 5th behind the two fast ones and Dortmund.Inside isn\'t always the place to be at Pimlico(2013 Preakness)but if it\'s fair the Scrappy T trip without the bolting gets a nice piece of this if one of those two can fire a 0 on Saturday.

Five weeks,positive rider switch and a longer price will probably have me on Divining Rod of the two.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: NormandyInvasion on May 13, 2015, 08:11:47 AM
Curious about your high opinion of Upstart.  Not that he\'s a bad horse, but he\'s going to be the top 3yo of the second half of the year?  I just don\'t see it.  Not only do I think AP, Dortmund, Texas Red, Firing Line, Frosted, Kentuckian, and several others may be better horses, it\'s rare that a horse finish so poorly in the KY Derby and rebound to be the best in the crop over the second half of the year.  Not sure it\'s ever happened.  The Derby has a way with weeding out horses.  The only ones I can think of to run poorly (and not as poorly as Upstart ran) and came back to be top horses were those who cut back to sprinting.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: Holybull1 on May 13, 2015, 08:42:28 AM
NormandyInvasion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
 it\'s rare that a horse finish so poorly in the KY Derby and
> rebound to be the best in the crop over the second
> half of the year.  Not sure it\'s ever happened.

Holy Bull.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: magicnight on May 13, 2015, 08:52:07 AM
Hansel.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: NormandyInvasion on May 13, 2015, 08:59:17 AM
Holybull1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NormandyInvasion Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>  it\'s rare that a horse finish so poorly in the KY
> Derby and
> > rebound to be the best in the crop over the
> second
> > half of the year.  Not sure it\'s ever happened.
>
>
> Holy Bull.

Good catch.  I guess he\'d qualify.  I remember Croll being certain that someone tampered with him, and given what an anomaly that Derby was, perhaps Croll was right.

I\'ve been proven wrong in that it has happened, but I\'m not seeing too many similarities between the Bull and Upstart.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: magicnight on May 13, 2015, 09:02:59 AM
I\'ve been reminded about Snow Chief - 11th in the Derby and 3YO champion.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 13, 2015, 09:04:44 AM
My opinion of Upstart going forward is based on a) my opinion of Upstart before, which was as strongly as I have ever felt about a young horse, Rachel included (which in turn is why I recommended Winstar buy into him), b) that he has no soundness issues, Derby eased and Florida wars notwithstanding, c) his pedigree is not especially early and his pattern before he got sick was unbelievably strong for further development.

Elliott sent me a video of Upstart getting a break at Winstar a couple of days ago, I think an edited version is up on their site somewhere. Tell me how that horse looks.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: NormandyInvasion on May 13, 2015, 09:05:14 AM
magicnight Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hansel.


Ok, now I might have to start nitpicking.  Beaten 10 lengths.  Upstart was beaten by about 60 lengths.  It\'s not easy to be beaten that badly.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: magicnight on May 13, 2015, 09:11:29 AM
You are nitpicking. I\'ll add Skip Away and suggest that there are as many fluky Derby winners as there are top-notch horses who did not run well in the Derby.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 13, 2015, 09:12:16 AM
After Upstart ran lousy in the Derby I was trying to sell running in the Preakness, made a list of something like 13 that came back to run big there. Skip Away comes to mind, It\'smyluckyday, Oxbow, others. Of the ones who ran bad but not horrible Point Given, Pine Bluff, etc.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: miff on May 13, 2015, 09:14:06 AM
JB,

Why would the Tampa Bay Derby be faster. There were three races at 1 1/16th miles that day and the best could get to was TG 1.75(beyer had TG 2, Rags slower, forgot fig) Carpe\'s X in derby irrelevant to TB fig.

Remarked pre derby that Carpe Diem was slow with nice pattern, TG had him fast.What did you see that was missed by many with Tampa Bay fig,subsequent starts by a few running back?

Mike
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: pizzalove on May 13, 2015, 09:33:49 AM
TGJB I would love to see the video.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 13, 2015, 09:41:20 AM
Correct that CD\'s Derby X has nothing to do with it. I had it for review as soon as I did the day.

If you do the race with the rest of the day it\'s right as is, it\'s how I did it originally and it may still turn out that\'s correct. It\'s also the last dirt race on the card following two grass races so it\'s isolated, and tracks often change late in the card.

The way I did it a large number of horses ran significantly worse than their tops, unusual (but possible) for stake level 3yos. The only two horses who look better this way than faster are the first two finishers. So far two of the other horses have jumped forward in their next, Danzig Moon being one.

When I make a final decision I\'ll post the whole race. I\'m guessing someone will remind me.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 13, 2015, 09:44:10 AM
Should be on Winstar site, if not now soon. Elliott was lucky to get out of the pen in one piece.
Title: Re: Upon Further Review
Post by: TGJB on May 18, 2015, 09:38:08 AM
So I was hoping to get some help from Ami\'s Flatter (second in the Tampa Derby) but he apparently didn\'t like poly at Woodbine and ran in the crapper at 3/5 Saturday. If he ran either another 3 3/4 or a couple of points faster this would be pretty easy, but nooooo.....