Print Page - Now we have a game.

Title: Now we have a game.
Post by: TGJB on May 01, 2013, 10:04:27 AM

http://www.drf.com/news/drug-testing-funding-proposed-legislation

I heard yesterday this might be coming. But the devil is definitely in the details.

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: Rich Curtis on May 01, 2013, 10:17:16 AM

\"Sen. Tom Udall, Democrat of Pennsylvania,\"

Did he move?

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: arosenzweig on May 01, 2013, 10:40:47 AM

This is for sure a step in the right direction, however the USADA has dropped the ball in the past in regards to other sports.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing/laughably-usada-sanctions-erik-morales-months-fights (http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing/laughably-usada-sanctions-erik-morales-months-fights-despite-235758589--box.html)

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: sekrah on May 01, 2013, 12:24:36 PM

Yeah, I don\'t have any confidence the Feds will be much better on this.

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: jerry on May 01, 2013, 04:50:14 PM

It says New Mexico.

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: Rich Curtis on May 01, 2013, 04:55:42 PM

It does now. Look at the bottom: \"A previous version of this article misstated the state Sen. Tom Udall represents. It is New Mexico, not Pennsylvania.\"

Title: Re: Now we have a game.
Post by: jerry on May 01, 2013, 06:05:46 PM

You\'re right. I missed that. I\'m sorry.

Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: TGJB on May 01, 2013, 10:04:27 AM