Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: TGJB on March 15, 2013, 10:30:16 AM

Title: ROTW
Post by: TGJB on March 15, 2013, 10:30:16 AM
Rebel.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: phil23 on March 15, 2013, 10:37:44 AM
Massive weight break, fantastic 2yo pattern leading to fast top, the other fast ones marooned outside, not the favourite, jock who likes to save, decent trainer (lol), and...will not be the fave.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: JoseOcon on March 15, 2013, 01:22:30 PM
Nice! time to make some money, I want to go shopping :)
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: toppled on March 15, 2013, 05:36:16 PM
Until proved otherwise, every horse who ran in the Remsen is a bet against.  It\'s one of the biggest negative-key races I\'ve seen in years.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: SOUTHERN SLEW on March 15, 2013, 09:19:58 PM
I would like to take this opportunity to highly commend the Thorograph team for their outstanding handicapping in last weeks San Felipe Stakes -- Grade II Santa Anita, Race 7, March 9, 2013. Your analysis of the race was excellent and it was a great opportunity to learn how to use the numbers to dissect and isolate the winner at great odds, its never easy beating the favorite in a major stake race, but what I admire best about your style of handicapping is that you always  try to find value and horses that are overlays, you seem to have the ability to always  select the horse that the track handicapper and the public overlooks.
I have learned a lot from your weekly ROTW analysis, it has help me to improve my own handicapping plus better appreciation for your sheets which I have been using for many years now.
Thanks again, I was able to hit the exacta and the triple in that race
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TreadHead on March 16, 2013, 06:27:03 AM
Think we\'ve already had this discussion at length on this board, it is far too early to dismiss the Remsen as a negative key.  You are buying into runaway public hype that is not rooted in any reasonable statistical analysis.

You have 3 horses from the Remsen worth discussing, one of them ran a poor race back this year, one of them ran a hugely buried effort that was as fast as Super99 or any West Coast effort this year, and the third is Delhomme who races for the first time today.  That is hardly enough data to draw any sort of conclusion, and the data that does exist is split 50/50 against the thesis.

If Delhomme runs poorly today (which might be due to some physical problem given the long layoff as opposed to strength of the Remsen) and NormandyInv runs poorly in his net outing, then you would have the statistical data to make such a statement.  Until that happens, it is baseless hot air.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: miff on March 16, 2013, 06:49:07 AM
Fair assessment Thread, re the Remsen.Re \"the hugely buried effort\" of NI, good luck with that on no less than several racing levels.Expecting NI to show much better on his preferred Aqu strip come the Wood. Did not come close to running as racetrack fast as SNN in his empty phony wide fig\'d race at FG.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TreadHead on March 16, 2013, 06:57:25 AM
I agree that NI would not have caught SNN putting their last races together due to the easy lone lead SNN was able to get.  But we will learn a lot more about him today, where there is no possible way he will get an uncontested early lead to nurse around the track, and this is likely to be the case for all remaining races up to the Derby.  Under those conditions, and the way NI was closing at FG, I like NI much better in the upcoming preps.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: miff on March 16, 2013, 07:23:13 AM
Thread,

Don\'t disagree with any of that, just stating that NI\'s last fig is lofty relative to the lack of running he did in the Risen Star.

And yes,like SNN, they all look good loose on the lead running off the screen.For example,Pletcher firster, Zaikov(3 yr old out of fast turf mare Wait A While)ran a Beyer of 99(like TG 1.25)at 6f, Gulf yesterday.


Mike
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: toppled on March 16, 2013, 07:41:31 AM
I\'m not buying into any public hype, I\'m just looking at the Remsen chart on Formulator & I find the following results on the horse\'s position in the Remsen & each subsequent race:
1st-5th
2nd-5th
4th-4th
5th-3rd, 2nd
6th-5th
7th-9th, 5th
9th-5th, 5th
That\'s 0 for 10 among the horses who have raced back.  If Delhomme was running in an Opt 75k like the only horse to even hit the board, 5th place finisher Indy\'s Illusion has done, he might have a shot to win, but he\'s in a Grade II stake today.  
When I see horses coming back that poorly out of a race, it goes into the negative-key category. It\'s been almost 4 months already & nobody has come back to do anything. I\'ll let the 1st one to win a race out of the Remsen beat me.  I\'ll bet it\'s in some minor allowance or a claiming race, not a Grade II stakes race.  
I\'m a big football fan, your defense of the Remsen reminds me of the many times my team has had a bad QB and because he was a high draft choice, many fans post on message boards that he just needs more time for the light to come on before the team switches QBs.  4 months is enough time to call a negative-key race a negative-key race.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: phil23 on March 16, 2013, 09:06:11 AM
A high draft choice is based on speculation. Delhomme is based on fact. To be specific, figures. He was faster than anyone in this race...FOUR MONTHS AGO. The long layoff is the one concern, not some phantom negative key race business (and NI ran quite alright besides that). We\'re getting a price (from the sounds of it, maybe even more than just a bit if everyone buys into this neg key race biz) that more than makes up for the concern over the long layoff.

Praying the first ticks on S99 & TB are evens and 5/2.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TreadHead on March 16, 2013, 09:49:54 AM
Yeah, I get what the general public is using in that analysis, and it seems highly questionable.  It is an extremely superficial and simplistic view.  The top 3 finished 16 lengths in front of the others, so evaluating what anyone other than the top 3 did in that race is of little value and dilutes what the top 3 actually did.  No one expected anything out of those also-rans and when the gap is that large, whatever they did or did not do later doesn\'t really speak to the ability of the top 3.

The key question at hand here is whether or not those top3 are really as good as the TG figures they earned indicate.  And on that matter, there is only 2 races to go on (one good and one bad), as I already mentioned, and a conclusion cannot be drawn yet.

Also, using what place a horse finished a race in as opposed to the ability/number he actually ran is going to raise chuckles from most handicappers, novice and expert alike.  And on the latter point, Normandy Invasion ran a race quite competitive with most of the other top 3 yr olds regardless of what place he finished in, save Verz and IMLD.

If Delhomme comes out and runs poorly today, then I\'ll start to listen to these points a little more, but as of right now all I hear is people saying that because horses that were beaten 16 lengths in the Remsen never did anything, that race was bad, and because that \"race was bad\" I should ignore the competitive figures, breeding, and pace style I see on the paper in front of me.  To me, that is using voodoo and hype over solid facts, but to each his own.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TGJB on March 16, 2013, 10:10:04 AM
Independent of figure correctness questions there is no way to judge any 3yo until he\'s run twice, especially when their trainers are trying to get them to peak in the Derby and last preps for big money.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: jimbo66 on March 16, 2013, 05:19:58 PM
Tread,

By the time you get enough evidence to realize that the Remsen was over-rated, it will be way too late to know that.

The idea is to get ahead of the curve.

Delhomme awful today. Over analyze awful.  And half the people who viewed the Fair Grounds race for Normandy invasion as awful.  (I know u don\'t think so)
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TreadHead on March 16, 2013, 05:43:26 PM
What\'s wrong with the Fairgrounds race?  The 4th place finisher nearly won this today and was well ahead of several other well-though-of horses today.  Oxbow\'s performance validates Normandy Invasion\'s race, there is simply no other possible way to look at it.

There\'s also no denying that those who took a stand against Remsen horses this spring are doing well with their wagers.  We will see what the post race comments about Delhomme were, because he was eased in the stretch to me means physical problems from the long layoff and not proper to draw any conclusions relating back to the Remsen if he is injured or has some other issue. Could be a classic case of too fast too soon, who knows.

All that said, I still don\'t see any reason to not expect a big race from NI in his next outing, and Oxbow\'s performance today did nothing but strengthen that position.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: jimbo66 on March 16, 2013, 06:20:38 PM
I am not criticizing the entire fairgrounds race. I am specifically saying Normandy invasion was awful.  Oxbow showed tactical speed in that race, pulled into contention and took the lead while wide.   Way different for me than just empty wide around the track (with trouble)


If u think oxbows run today validates Normandy invasion, we are just playing different games. Don\'t see it
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TreadHead on March 16, 2013, 07:25:39 PM
I\'m sure others are growing quite tired of this topic, so this will be my last post on it.

You are comparing 2 horses and define one that at 6f is in 10th place nearly 8 lengths behind the other (Oxbow) and then closes over 6 lengths on that horse thru to the finish, finishing within a length of him and moving by him just after the wire, you are defining this as \"empty\".  If this horse is \"empty\", then yeah, you and I are watching 2 different games and there is no use discussing it any further.

Oxbow\'s tactical speed was enough to place him just in front of NI last time at 8.5f, but in both that race and the one today, tactical speed did not win the race, so I\'m not sure why that is such a huge bonus over a deep closer who raced greenly last time and can definitely improve next out.  I don\'t expect him to be any match for Verrazano on his best, but I think it is far too soon to write him off as a factor in 3yr old stakes when you look at what he did at FG and what Oxbow came back and did today.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: miff on March 17, 2013, 06:56:34 AM
Another weak prep, another generous Beyer 95(Moss a poor fig maker next to Hopkins/Jerardi)Cudos to OP track maintenance for having the surface unforgiving(dull/slow)on their 2nd biggest race day. Route times pathetic, many horses struggled,speed awful in routes.

Delhomme was not sent to Florida after the Remsen with the rest of TAP\'s top propects,good horse,could not run that badly without a major excuse.

Good for the game that D Wayne has a couple on the derby trail,notwithstanding they have little chance in the derby.Oxbow tough little unlucky horse, did most running again but run over late for the second time,seems distance challenged.Winner determined type, had nice flow on a surface playing to his running style,wide off last turn,looked non threatening but got home,slowly!
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: big18741 on March 17, 2013, 07:45:39 AM
Heard that Delhomme lost it getting saddled.

Dens Legacy got the easiest trip and couldn\'t beat either Lukas.
Can\'t see him making an impact in a Triple Crown race.

Lukas might have 15% of the Derby field if he gets Titletown Five enough points in New Mexico.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: RogerC on March 17, 2013, 08:11:19 AM
It seems that everyone gets caught up in derby fever and forgets to bet the race that is staring them in the face. The Price on Will Take Charge was ridiculous his Race  in the Smarty Jones was visually impressive and then a real clunker in the slop against the same animals. His half brother Take Charge Indy got real good this time of year when he won the Florida Derby. Other than Oxbow and S99 who else was faster. I threw out Delhomme who was dead on the board off the layoff. Treasury Bill was way over bet trying a route the 1st time. Made a nice hit for the day Congrats to team Lukas and Jon Court on a perfect ride for the victory....RC
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: TGJB on March 17, 2013, 09:07:23 AM
Jimbo-- Delhomme\'s race yesterday made more sense if he ran a couple (or more) points slower in the Remsen?

The other two ran about 3 points off their tops in their return. If neither gets back to their top next time we can start having a conversation about the figure being 3 points too fast. I myself don\'t doubt the figure any more than I did 3 months ago.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: jimbo66 on March 17, 2013, 09:19:53 AM
TGJB,

Not questioning the figure in the Remsen. I believe that roughly speaking, all the figure makers were in agreement on it.

You/I are in different positions.  You will wait a few more races and recheck your figures, to ensure your product is correct.  As you should.  I, and other gamblers, can\'t afford to wait months to notice a trend.  The Remsen horses have run like shit.  They just have.  Tossing Delhomme yesterday was the play for those that believe the Remsen was over-rated.  Unfortunately, it is already too late to get value with that opinion, it seems, as Delhomme was dead on the board and actually an overlay, versus his figures.
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: Silver Charm on March 17, 2013, 09:56:33 AM
Another weak Prep? The Preps are the Preps, there is nothing else!! This was run in the same time as the Azeri which included some quality Older Mares.

So far there are Verannzano\'s figures and the 1-2 finishers in the Holy Bull which was fast. Speaking of the Holy Bull the Pletcher horse was actually trained pretty steady after the BC Juvy so they clearly had a plan. Get thier points in the Holy Bull and adjust the Derby schedule accordingly. Which they did. Durable in an era of brittle late starters. A Juvenile Champ who could actully be Sleeper!!

Regarding Oxbow I am wondering if he is looking around and pulling himself up or what. Jocks continue to move him to the front like they thing they have horse and he seems to lose focus. Right now he is probably working off three straight 2\'s. Not a bad line to jump forward from with 6 weeks to go. D Wayne getting Calumet Farm back in to the Winners Circle in the Derby would be Legendary!!!
Title: Re: ROTW
Post by: miff on March 17, 2013, 10:26:54 AM
\"Another weak Prep? The Preps are the Preps, there is nothing else!! This was run in the same time as the Azeri which included some quality Older Mares\"

Silver,

Yes, this and the FG prep,way weaker than those you mention.The Azeri, with some quality older mares,was also on the slow side, My Miss Aurelia particularly empty.

Re Oxbows ground loaded 2\'s, he\'ll need to grow about a hand in 6 weeks to be a serious TC factor.Think eventually Will Take Charge will be more of a factor than Oxbow.

Good Luck,
Mike

P.S. heard that Will Take Charge ran the fastest prep of any horse according to Equibase, Brilliant!! If true.