Print Page - Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.

Title: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: TGJB on May 15, 2009, 05:20:11 PM

here\'s an update on that filly Scott Lake claimed a few months ago.

Title: Re: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: Uncle Buck on May 15, 2009, 06:01:01 PM

But he looks so trustworthy!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_KBEhAxIJyoY/SbuPfWPepEI/AAAAAAAABK4/UNiLHjvm4lE/s400/websiteLakeScott.jpg

Title: Re: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: Dana666 on May 15, 2009, 07:32:31 PM

Unbelievable!!! You should testify before Congress!

Title: Re: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: Boscar Obarra on May 15, 2009, 08:03:37 PM

I\'d like to see a quote from Ann Merryman, maybe the prev owner too.

Title: Re: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: tmon on May 16, 2009, 06:01:23 AM

Well looking at the odds it sure wasn\'t a surprise to anybody on the track.

Title: Re: Testing? We don't need no stinking testing.
Post by: basket777 on May 16, 2009, 07:27:42 AM

What can be so good ?

Ask the Experts