Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: JimP on February 07, 2003, 10:19:34 AM

Title: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: JimP on February 07, 2003, 10:19:34 AM
Someone who has the numbers should start an attrition list. Post all the 3-year-olds that ran a sub 6 last year. And then check them off one-by-one as they fall by the wayside.
Title: Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: Phalaris on February 07, 2003, 10:39:37 AM
If someone does this, humor me and note the distance at which this figure was accomplished.

Title: Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: bdhsheets on February 07, 2003, 10:02:54 PM
You might get your wish...........

Title: Re: super (like me) 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: supey on February 08, 2003, 01:13:14 AM
could you please do the same w/a random sampling of 2 yo\'s in the 8-10 range, as well as the 12-14 range?

also, I\'d like those 3 categories broken down by # of starts.bdhsheets wrote:
Title: Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: supey on February 08, 2003, 11:41:20 AM
just wanted to repost this at the top, in case anybody missed it, as it actually involves horses.
Title: Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
Post by: TGJB on February 08, 2003, 12:07:22 PM
Actually, I\'m glad you did, and not just because you are proving my point about Ragozin guys.
Listen, you are obviously profoundly smart, and have given it a lot of thought, and know you are using the best figures. So, educate us-- having read Friedman\'s post, explain how they came up with the Chilukki figure.
Or, just make another wisecrack, which we will take to mean you have no answer...