Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: JR on December 08, 2008, 11:26:58 AM

Title: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: JR on December 08, 2008, 11:26:58 AM
Haynesfield? Fastest horse? Unless there\'s an error on my sheets, he\'s the 5th fastest horse. Explanation?
Title: Re: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: TGJB on December 08, 2008, 12:14:53 PM
Alan will be back in the office tomorrow.
Title: Re: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: drbillym on December 08, 2008, 04:00:40 PM
If you go in the redboard room, Haynesfield was the choice on Alan\'s analysis.
Title: Re: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: drbillym on December 08, 2008, 04:03:17 PM
sorry, you already knew that
Title: Re: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: TGAB on December 09, 2008, 01:50:42 PM
Three of the four faster horses had already bounced off the faster top and were headed in the wrong direction, so I thought. Faster horse number four was entered back here four weeks after a layoff-aided 12-1/2 point new top. Going long, a bounce seemed the most likely result. That left Hainesfield as the fastest (remaining) horse that was least likely to bounce and/or most likely to move forward. Granted my verbiage was confusing and did not express clearly the method to the seeming madness. With hope the above explanation removes the fog.
Title: Re: Aqueduct Analysis
Post by: ronwar on December 09, 2008, 03:56:46 PM
Very interesting how you looked at the tops that way to reduce the fastest play.  You really should right a book with the angles and patterns you look at.  I would buy it and I\'m sure I would get more from it than the whole DRF collection combined. You take paypal :)