Dylan??
Jenny,
His TG figs do not do him justice nor do they match other serious data which shows DT to be a layover. It\'s more a question of how he will handle the boggy turf course which is ALWAYS big trouble handicapping turf races.Good Luck
Mike
DT and wins the objection.............
Key the horse that TG analysis says \"probably won\'t improve now\" or \"probably won\'t jump forward.\"
Enough already,idiot.
Considering the conditions, get real with the Rag/Hardoon BS or any data for that matter. It\'s a stabbing crapshoot for the most part.
Mike
miff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Considering the conditions, get real with the
> Rag/Hardoon BS or any data for that matter. It\'s a
> stabbing crapshoot for the most part.
>
> Mike
Mike,
I agree that it doesn\'t stack up like users would want it to,
but I do think that aberrant conditions offer value if you go
a bit out of the standard box, and get real nitty gritty about
surface, speed, and other pace elements. \"Pace\" over \"Performance\"
thinking will yield today, if careful. Careful of course isn\'t for
everyone.
Lone Star was wet, CD was inside, this is what it is. We just need to
be sober and selective the rest of the way today. AND remember one of
Jerry\'s fundamental beliefs - the track conditions change. The turf gets
cut up, the main track goes forward and back as they try to maintain it
and with more or less water as it goes. Floated tracks are not all the same;
the more cut it they get...Cobalt Blue just came from last. After lots of rain,
it gets like art work, but then that might be what you mean by stabbing. Good luck. I actually like this. Most decisions are made on these events too soon; the danger of much pre-thought before conditions present themselves. Many ways, the cat to skin!
skip