Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: kev on October 23, 2005, 11:16:49 AM

Title: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 11:16:49 AM
Looks like to me it\'s going to take a -2 to -3 to win this race.

You have two of the three fav\'s that looks like to run a soild race. Being Saint L. and Rock. meaning I can\'t toss them nor can I make them a key. The other horse being Borrego, he might be backing up off that big race last time out. So what other horses at long odds and that are fast enough will do. Next is Flower Alley has a -2.2 and get\'s in light, I don\'t like the high bounce in his last race but he could come back around to the -0.2 range with weight he could grap a little share of it. Sir Shackleton has a -2.2 he caught my eye the other day looking like he had a line where he could pop in that big race again, then this morning I study it a little bit more and thought now he really had a shot to run his top, and he will be every bit of 20-1 or more. Perfect Drift at best will run his -0.2. Sun King even though he has a -1.0 at the weight it would make him a horse to deal with. SK line is ok, good thing is he\'s a 3yr and has about seven weeks from that top.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: scottv on October 23, 2005, 02:19:23 PM
RHT\'s poor performance outside of California really, really bothers me.  Plus the foot bruise just further adds risk to betting him.  St. Liam\'s layoff is not attractive, but since he has a race over the track, a great jockey and the right running style, he seems more attractive than RHT.  
Perfect Drift scares me as a place/show horse wager at 20-1.

Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 02:43:28 PM
What you saw of RHT outside Cali was all pre Mandella and was as an immature 3yo.
The foot bruise issue is another matter that has me concerned.


NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: scottv on October 23, 2005, 03:01:45 PM
I love RHT, it\'s just hard for me to convincingly bet thim with that negative hanging on his back.  I lost alot of money on that Baffert horse (i can\'t remember his name) in the 99 Classic at gulfstream who had the same problem.  He was awesome in CA but when he shipped he was bad.  That led to Cat Thief, Budroyale, Golden Missile, Chester House superfecta that paid tons.

Point is, he\'s 50/50 to run out of the money, can you say the same thing about St. Liam???
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 03:17:26 PM
Saint Liam is the best 9F horse in the world. He has only tried 10F once and was by far his worst race in the past two years.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: on October 23, 2005, 03:32:17 PM
\"Saint Liam is the best 9F horse in the world. He has only tried 10F once and was by far his worst race in the past two years.\"

To me this is the key to the race.

His only attempt at 10F was pretty poor. IMHO, you can even make a little case that in a couple of his 9F races he didn\'t look like a 10F horse (prior to getting really good). However, that poor effort did come on a ship out to CA. Plenty of horses throw in a dud making that ship without it being an indication of anything. He was pretty much toast in that race before they even ran 9F. It\'s not like he tired in the last 70 yards. I\'m confused enough to not know how I\'m going to play that race yet. I can\'t see taking him at a very short price, but I think he\'s the best horse if 10F is within his range to deliver a top effort. I\'m hoping he draws a far outside post. Then I\'ll feel better about betting against him.        

Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 03:46:35 PM
Im with you on this race. All of the big 3 have legit questions about them. and I am going to wait until the PP and Jockeys are listed. It will be an interesting race for sure. I will be hoping that \"Parochialism\" in wageing will effect the odds to some extent.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 04:58:34 PM
I don\'t look at it as a distance problem for him, hell it\'s only what another what 1F you think that caused him to run up the track like that?? I saw a 0-2-X pattern coming into that SA race for him. Just ran the -6 and then a -0.2 and then a -4 if that wasn\'t sitting him up for a off race I don\'t know what it was. RHT only earned a 1pt better fig than he did, SL had more weight and was wider in that race. SL got a better fig than Borrego he had 115lbs and SL had 122lbs.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 05:17:45 PM
Bet him then. Good luck.

I\'m sure he can be an in the money horse so I\'m not tossing him out completely, I just think he\'s not running at the end of his 9F races, he\'s hanging on for dear life  he\'s life or death at 10F. His Tomlinsons for the distance are quite weak at 272. We all know Peace Rules was not a 10F horse and that one Kicked his ass last year at 9F.  As for his pattern comming in, he had significant time off before the Donn  so his pattern should factor in his rest as well. Although he did beat RIM and Eddington at that time both were comming in off layoffs with RIM pointing for the Dubai Classic. The ship to Cali was probably very tough on him so he does have an excuse, but Dutrow is a shrewd guy, why has he not run him 10F other than that one? The Foster came up light as he beat Eurosilver (A Big Nobody) and Perfect Drift (Always a Bridesmaid). Dutrow felt the need to use a rabbit to insure a victory against Commentator.  Can he win, sure. Will he be a value play? No way. I think there are enough questions to seek value elsewhere.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: scottv on October 23, 2005, 05:42:09 PM
I like your reasoning.  Part of the problem here is that so many horses have a knock, and most of them appear to slow to win.  The other problem I have is finding pace here.  Not any frontrunners to speak of that are fast enough to cause a hot pace for Borrego, Cnation, Oratorio, Shackleton etc.  

That keeps me looking at Liam, RHTen

who do you like?
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: big ant on October 23, 2005, 05:43:22 PM
He drew the far outside that day in Cali off an effort, and at even money he was the biggest toss of all time;he was wide both turns, but even if he had a dream trip he was getting beat that day;This horse needs time between effots. I think that Bailey tried to save some last time(I have no idea what he ran that day # wise), but if it was an effort i\'m not sure seven weeks is enough for him to recover and run well at a distance he is suspect at. The other thing to consider in this race is that it isn\'t around two turns, and i think that changes things considerably;I think they will go fast early.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 05:59:16 PM
I never said I was betting him, I\'m not tossing him out of my play\'s, my point is it\'s one race he ran at 10.0, you mean to tell me if the woodward was 10.0 he would have lost? or any of his other races in which he won?? I think if he looses sat. it\'s going to be cause he wasn\'t ready to fire that day, what if he had a pattern that looked good to you he was going to run his -6.0 would the distance stop you?? It\'s only an extra what 12/13 seconds??
Let\'s look at those Tom. distance figs.
1. A Bit O\'Gold is 3-2-1-0 at this distance and has a 264
2. Borrego is 6-2-1-1 has a 229
3. Flower Alley 3-1-0-0 has a 254
Hell Volponi had a 205 coming in the BC the year he won.
Other\'s in the race are ok on the rating\'s, some are not. I never look at those things anyway\'s. I have a question about those if you do use them, in the sprint they have a rating and all of them seem to be high, why is that?? Are they more for longer races??
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 06:02:41 PM
Oh, those Tom.\'s figs that your talking about are those the same in the DRF?? That\'s what I was looking at.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: Michael D. on October 23, 2005, 06:11:33 PM
SL doesn\'t finish that well, but if bailey gets him in a nice stalking position in the clear, three wide or so, he probably buries these by the quarter pole. he could finish in :26 or :27 and they will still be running for second. the danger is that SL faces some adversity and doesn\'t get to relax. what happens if he\'s stuck in behind horses in mid pack and has to make a wide sweeping move to win it? at 9/5 in a fourteen horse field, you would like to see at least one rough trip victory on his resume...... how about a bit\'o gold. TG has last 10f dirt race, the one that went in 2:07.2, pretty darn fast (two lengths faster than tiznow\'s \'01 BC run, and nearly six lengths faster than tiznow\'s \'00 BC run). i guess you could include this guy at 50-1.  
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 06:43:24 PM
 First I am not espousing the virtues of Tomlinson figures here. They are one tool. The Tomlinson\'s are only good if the horses sire has a lot of history. We know St. Ballado has a lot of history to draw from. Volponi who I bet, had 10F history and 12F History on Turf btw.  Crytoclearance his sire has bred many a 10F winner. I\'m doubting your Tomlinson for Volponi. I\'ll look it up later.

Anyway, Kev, Have you ever run yourself? Its only another 660 feet or 230 yards? After running a mile the last 1320 feet is what seperates the winners fom the losers. The extra 1F doesn not mean it\'s an automatic 12-13 seconds at that stage of the race. It\'s a velocity kind of thing at that stage of the race. SL usually finishes the last furlong in 13 and change while RHT usually finished in 12 and change. Also a -6 at 9F does not mean it will be a -6 at 10F.

I really like this horse Starcraft some along with RHT. I am waiting for the TG seminar to finalize my bets and see who drops out between now and then.
Again I am not saying St. Liam cannot win, but I don\'t think he will be a good value Bet.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 06:47:11 PM
Michael I\'ve been looking at that number too. Am waiting to see what TGJB has to say about that one in the seminar. Would be a potential value play at those odds.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 06:50:16 PM
That\'s cool, I think RHT is going to be about the same price of SL maybe even the fav. that\'s all people are talking about on TV RHT and how good he looks and the hype around this horse, which I think he could go either way, he runs a new top and backs up off that -2.1, no pairing up for him. Also I knew you was going to ask something on the line about does that extra 1F thing really matter, ok maybe if the horse is in an close battle, but like I said that you never answer, what if you though he was going to run the -6.0 or a -4.0, would it really matter? Also if you look up the number on Voloni I was looking at the 2002 form I have here it might have change by now. Also Voloni ran 10.0 on the turf 1 time on fin. 4th beaten 5 3/4 and ran 12.0 fin. 3rd beaten by 2L.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: Michael D. on October 23, 2005, 06:59:23 PM
Kev,
SL is around 8/5 now. RHT between 7/2 and 4/1. If they scrape the track, SL will go off at 6/5 or 7/5. If it\'s playing heavy like it\'s been, maybe closer to 2/1, with RHT and Borrego picking up the slack.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 07:29:11 PM
Kev,

With the race being run at Belmont, many of the hometown bettors who may be sitting on the fence will go with the one they know St. Liam over RHT for all the reason you mentioned earlier. TVG guys are west coast guys so they always lean to the left some. Borrego will also get significant play because of Big wins on both coasts in Big races. I\'ll wait and see what the odds are before I make a play anyway. Right now Im thinking RHT will be a better value play and more logical winner at this distance than SL. Sometimes I wait too long to wager - sometimes to a fault of almost getting shut out.

Now if you can guarantee me St. Liam runs a -6 at 10F Im betting the college fund. No one else \"can\" run that other than St. Liam and I don\'t think he does at 10F.

One other thing, while we give St. Liam a built in excuse comming from Post 11 in the Cali 10F race, RHT came from Post 10 in same race. And we had been dissing Cali horses all year etc but Who won the derby? What did Cali horses do on BC preview day at belmont? Food for thought.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 23, 2005, 07:54:20 PM
Your right about the east coast thing and people betting SL, whose the wise guy horse so far??
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 23, 2005, 08:15:37 PM
I\'m not sure there is a wise guy horse yet as the Public Handicappers have until Wed to make there prognostications.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: bdhsheets on October 23, 2005, 09:44:25 PM
Say what you will, many quality horses head west and fail miserably for whatever reason. Perhaps the constant tremors spook some of them. I\'ll give SL a pass for that one.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: TGJB on October 24, 2005, 10:03:50 AM
I also questioned that Bit O\'Gold #, so we reviewed everyone out of the race, and it looks right.
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: kev on October 24, 2005, 08:02:53 PM
For right now, it could change after Wed.

Saint L. his sheets just looks like he runs another -2
Borrego I know some horses will pair up their big jump up number, but on 4 weeks rest I think he back\'s up off of that last #
F.Alley at very best might come back around and run a -0.2
Sir Shack. I\'m adding this guy onto my Pick 4, something about his line and that -2.2 from back in Feb. is calling my name.
P.Drift at best a -0.2
RHT one of two things he\'ll do, run a -4 or better or bounce off of that -2.1
Super F. nothing great looking about his sheet
Sun King is a three old and has a -1 and get\'s a weight break, but right now he\'s on the bubble for me.
Suave I\'ve already talked about him and he could be sitting on a big one.
C.Nation another one who could run a -0.2 at best.

Right now I\'ve got: SL, Sir, RHT, Suave. I could add in Sun King depends on how many I take in the other three races.

Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 24, 2005, 08:39:08 PM
Kev,

Right about now it looks like this to me. I can see St. Liam winning this race 20% RHT 20% (waiting on foot),Flower Alley 15%,Super Frolic 10% (His race style is to press pace and being this race doesn\'t have a lot of early runners), I can see this one with a chance in the end and his figs Fit, Suave 10%, Borrego 10%, Starcraft 10% and the rest the remaining runners 15% with Oratorio, Bit o Gold and Sun King the best of that lot.

It\'s not  so cut and dried in my mind. I am anxiously awaiting the seminar to see if it provides insight that might provide some tie breakers for me. Right now I\'m thinking better value with RHT. I probaly have Super Frolic  and Starcraft a little higher than most.

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: jimbo66 on October 24, 2005, 08:50:29 PM
Tony,

If that is your odds line, then RHT is not \"value\".  You give him a 20% chance.,  He won\'t be more than 4-1, which is 20%.

Based on your odds line the value plays would be Flower Alley and Super Frolic.,  You give Flower Alley 15%, which is a bout 6-1.  I bet him earlier tonight at 26 to 1.  Super Frolic you give 10% which is 9-1 and he will be 25-1 on Saturday, maybe more (sorry Jerry).

Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: NoCarolinaTony on October 24, 2005, 09:03:36 PM
Jimbo,

I won\'t accept less than 4-1 on RHT, but you got me thinking now. Perhaps the play is Flower Alley. I can\'t see anyone else really with both proven figs and potential upside.  Is by Distorted Humor so will like mositure in the track and does have early speed which I hope he can control better than he did in last.

Super Frolic style might just work if it all plays out right and I feel could certainly be an exacta/tri/super type horse. The Deep closers may be at a disadvantage in this one.

Thanks.......

NC Tony
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: ronwar on October 25, 2005, 12:26:37 AM
I watched the replay of the race on youbet and the announcer mentioned a strong wind.  With his style and a return to the -2(distance shouldn\'t be a problem) I think Bit \'O Gold fits and certainly would spice up a super
Title: Re: The Classic
Post by: HP on October 25, 2005, 04:37:40 AM
I\'m with you Ronwar...50-1 and up looks good to me in this field.  

It wouldn\'t surprise me if you get your 4-1 and up on Rock Hard Ten.  

It\'s raining now (has been raining HARD all night) but it\'s supposed to lighten up later in the week into Saturday.  Big difference between a soaked Belmont and a drying out-type Belmont...  

HP