I posted on the other board:
\"Testing may not be as expensive as first thought. With so many jurisdictions moving in the right direction(testing, at least), it may be all we need do is watch who shows up at CDI tracks(Fairgrounds is awful) as prima facia positives.\"
******************
I like JB\'s idea about establishing a \"table\" detailing the various testing implementations and dates, track by track. I hope someone took him up on it (miff?). Such a \"table\" could establish enough of a structure to allow the motivation behind placements/entries by certain ti-trainers to become self-evident. raz