I can\'t find it.
Bet and lost on Maximum Security and on TFigs he looked just as much as the play to me. But where is the analysis??? Am I blind?
Tony Bada Bing
Do you ever buy anything here?
Or just pop up on big race days to tell us all how brilliant you are??
For $25 bucks you wouldn\'t have had to wonder if you were blind.
Actually it was $20. There was an A, B, C, D groups. The A had Game Winner and Improbable as most likely winner. There was a considerable amount of study analysis that was AGAINST Omaha Beach. But he was in the B as a hedge.
Tje patterns and reads and data were informative. I bet my horse anyway who was Tacitus and he was in the B.
P-Dub Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you ever buy anything here?
>
> Or just pop up on big race days to tell us all how
> brilliant you are??
>
> For $25 bucks you wouldn\'t have had to wonder if
> you were blind.
You are assuming interest in regard to bad analysis on my part.
How do you know it was bad if you didnt buy it? You never looked at it obviously.
The explanation was the last race 1 was pretty much a pair of the prior race 0. He was considered a B Play when at the same time the other primary speed who they didnt like was still considered to be in the race. Now only a total idiot would criticize something they never read or paid for. Get lost cheap skate
and you are assuming I\'m only interested in the analysis of the winner.
Anyway, I have the material for the Preakness and will join the discussion.
But back to the winner. Theres a lot to factor in that blown turn in regard to how fast that animal ran. At least to my eye.