Ask the Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: Holybull1 on December 30, 2016, 01:25:18 PM

Title: Glare Ice
Post by: Holybull1 on December 30, 2016, 01:25:18 PM
Superb call in the Aqu analysis. 26-1 on top.
Title: Re: Glare Ice
Post by: jpfeyche on December 30, 2016, 01:51:27 PM
Superb is right. If you\'d care to expound on the analysis, I, for one, would greatly appreciate it.
Title: Re: Glare Ice
Post by: philywheel on December 30, 2016, 02:06:52 PM
Cold exacta as well, I must say very Impressive
Title: Re: Glare Ice
Post by: philywheel on December 30, 2016, 02:08:09 PM
TG is having a great week for a free sheets, The Best Kind of advertisment
Title: Re: Glare Ice
Post by: TGAB on December 30, 2016, 02:59:32 PM
A $16,000 claiming race NW2L, these aren\'t very talented nor are they very consistent runners. Indeed as a general rule form variability is directly related to the quality of race as defined by type. Glare Ice\'s last was about 3 to 6 points off the faster runners in here but she showed a top last year which fit with these. She actually ran 3 in a row within a month and then regressed though not too badly. Importantly for Glare Ice or so I interpreted, her last was her best in this campaign, an effective \"top\"--1-1/4 points better than the 18-1/4--. It was a sign she was regaining her condition and optimistically augured for better. That slight new \"top\" came on about 6 weeks rest, good time, and as I often state in ROTWs slight new \"tops\" can presage imminent improvement. She had better to run back to and didn\'t have much to beat, and she was 12-1 ML. I graded it B- because she had to run well and the 4 or 5 others effectively faster now had to regress some. Possible because these are inconsistent sorts, but you\'re taking a shot.