For the life of me I cannot figure out how to read the pick 6 results.
I googled it and thought I had it figured out but Noooooooo this sequence makes no sense to me. This is the results of the Spa pick 6 yesterday
$2 Pick 6 2/4/6-2/3-5-4-2-4 (6 correct)
Race 1 2 wins
race 2 4 wins
race 3 6 scratch 2 wins correct?
race 4 thru 6 do not understand as they are showing 5 results..
Thanks
John
P.S If Exaggerator wins in the slop today would he be considered one of the best 3 year old slop specialist ever?
johnnym Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P.S If Exaggerator wins in the slop today would he
> be considered one of the best 3 year old slop
> specialist ever?
Two of the great 3YO off track performances took place in 1982: Conquistador
Cielo\'s Belmont Stakes blowout and a bit more than two months later when
Canadian Runaway Groom won a sloppy Travers, conquering the three classic
winners (Gato Del Sol, Alomas Ruler and Conquistador) of that year.
If Exaggerator wins wonder if we will hear that trainer Desormeaux opted for
Haskell based on anticipated wet track at Mth, an outstanding piece of weather
handicapping.
Yes Frank D would admire his meteorology skills..
1st leg-favored 2 won 4-6 scratched
2nd leg-favored 2 won 3 scratched
3rd-5
4th-4
5th-2
6th-4
Thank you I was getting my dashes and slashes confused